MouthShut’s plea on IT Rules 2011 to come up for hearing in SC

08 Jan,2014

By A Correspondent


The writ petition filed before the Supreme Court by, India’s online community for consumer reviews, challenging the Information Technology Rules, 2011 is to come up for hearing on January 13, 2014. The plea seeks to declare the IT Rules as violation of Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India which guarantee freedom of expression. will be represented by senior counsel, Harish Salve.


It may be recalled that had approached the Supreme Court with a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, to rescind India’s Information Technology Rules 2011 that “jeopardises the freedom of expression”. The appeal declares the IT Rules to be offensive under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. “We are pleading with the highest court in the land to protect the rights of Indian citizens and consumers that are granted by the Constitution of India,” said Faisal Farooqui, Founder & CEO, says it has stuck to its own policy of taking down content only under legal coercion. But the IT rules stating that ‘any affected person’ can simply send an email to request the removal of any content within 36 hours or they can lose their ‘safe harbour’ protection as an ‘intermediary, pay damages, legal fee and court time’. Web-based organisations need to have a difference between free expression and making feasible services.


Mr Farooqui further added, “We have been threatened with hundreds of legal notices, cybercrime complaints and defamation cases. At other times, officers from various police stations call our office, demanding deletion of various reviews or face dire consequences under the IT rules.”


“It is a privilege to be a citizen of a democracy like India, where an ordinary citizen can appeal to a powerful court. Laws are meant to ensure the well-being of the nation – its people and institutions. Despite good intentions, IT Rules fall short of doing that. This law has the potential to weaken or, worse, entirely corrode the robust protection that the constitution of India offers to the freedom of speech,” he continued




Post a Comment 

Comments are closed.

Today's Top Stories